Roller v. George H. Leonard & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg; Henry Clay McDowell, Judge. Action by George H. Eeonárd & Co., to the use of Marden, Orth & Hastings, against John E. Roller, trading as the Excelsior Oak Extract Company. Judgment for plaintiffs,, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
[1] The record, read in connection with the record in the writ of error in the same case, decided by this court on December 21, 1912 (201 Fed. 886, 120 C. C. A. 224), and the opinion of Judge Rose, discloses the history, of the transaction out of which the controversy arose and the questions presented upon the assignments of error. The defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, were, on and prior to September 12, 1904, engaged in business in Boston, Mass, as dealers in tanning materials, and in their course of business bought and sold oak extract. Their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hill v. ChipmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Long v. ConklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kentucky Natural Gas Corp. v. Indiana Gas & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Brevard Tannin Co. v. J. F. Mosser Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- Kutztown Foundry & Machine Co. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923