Legal Opinion

Davies v. City of East Saginaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChampitN, J.

The contention in this case arises out of a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant for grading and paving a portion of a 'street. The contract* by express reference and terms, makes the specifications, the notice to paving contractors, and proposals made by plaintiff, a part of the contract. These specifications bear upon their face evidence of having been 'drawn by a person unfamiliar with the terms he employed; or, if not unfamiliar, then he was guilty of a gross misuse of the English language to express the undertakings required of a contractor.

The specifications, after a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. WilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vanderlip v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Mathewson v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bolt v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pelton v. O'KeefeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API