Davies v. City of East Saginaw
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChampitN, J.
The contention in this case arises out of a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant for grading and paving a portion of a 'street. The contract* by express reference and terms, makes the specifications, the notice to paving contractors, and proposals made by plaintiff, a part of the contract. These specifications bear upon their face evidence of having been 'drawn by a person unfamiliar with the terms he employed; or, if not unfamiliar, then he was guilty of a gross misuse of the English language to express the undertakings required of a contractor.
The specifications, after a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. WilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vanderlip v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Mathewson v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Bolt v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Pelton v. O'KeefeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906