Mathewson v. City of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, ,J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts •are state in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This case comes here on declaration and ■demurrer. The demurrer was sustained in the court below.
The substance .of the declaration, as stated in plaintiffs’ ■ brief, and mainly correct, is as follows:
On the 14th day of May, 1888, plaintiffs entered into a contract with the city of Grand Rapids to improve North College avenue, which was executed in a proper manner by both parties. The improvement consisted of the grade and fill of such street from East Bridge street north to the city limits; the plaintiffs being required to furnish all material and incidental work, and according to plan,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Blanchard v. Inhabitants of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Newman v. SylvesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Vanderlip v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dolan v. BaldridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Pelton v. O'KeefeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906