Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 26, 2024No. 5:16-cv-03370Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 TERRY HAMM, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-03370-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 v. DISMISS; GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT; DENYING 11 MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 12 Defendant. 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 182, 183, 184 14 Plaintiff Terry Hamm (“Hamm”) individually and Plaintiff Steven Chan (“Chan”) 15 individually and on behalf of a putative class (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit under the 16 California Consumer Legal Remedies…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API