Legal Opinion

KADEL v. FOLWELL

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 10, 2022No. 1:19-cv-00272Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MAXWELL KADEL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) 1:19CV272 DALE FOLWELL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (CORRECTED VERSION) LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge. Plaintiffs are transgender individuals or the parents of transgender individuals who receive health insurance through the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees (“NCSHP” or the “Plan”). (ECF No. 75 ¶¶ 1, 7–12.) They allege that the Plan’s categorical exclusion of coverage for treatments “leading to or in…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API