Breshears v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.
The sole question presented in this appeal is whether, after recovering under an “open” fire insurance policy the cost of restoring a building to its pre-fire condition, the respondents may also recover the additional costs of reconstructing in compliance with changed building codes. Accordingly, the controversy centers on the interpretation of sections 411, 412, 2051, 2070 and 2071 of the Insurance CoclV.
Section 411 reads: “An open policy is one in which the value of the subject matter is not agreed upon, but is left to be ascertained in case of loss. ’ ’
Section 412 reads: “A valued policy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Twaits v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by17 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Third Establishment, Inc. v. 1931 North Park ApartmentsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Cisneros v. VueveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.