Seguro v. Cummiskey
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is the scope of an employer’s duty to supervise an employee. The defendant employer, John E. Cum-miskey, Jr., doing business as J.J. Toon’s Cafe,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff Lucio Seguro,2 who was injured when the defendant’s employee, William Leonard, caused a vehicular accident after leaving the premises of Leonard’s employment. The defendant claims that because an employer does not have a duty to supervise his employees off-site, the court should have granted his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brooks v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Malloy v. Town of ColchesterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cannizzaro v. MarinyakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Urie v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.