Cannizzaro v. Marinyak
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The issue before this court is the scope of an employer’s duty for the tortious conduct of an employee, outside the scope of his employment, that occurred off the employer’s premises. The plaintiff, Janine Cannizzaro, commenced this action after she was injured in an automobile accident with the defendant Stephan Marinyak. At the time of the accident, Marinyak was an employee of the defendant Diane Jennings Mayo, a homeowner in Redding.1 The plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thompson v. KaczinskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Aw v. Lancaster County School Dist. 0001Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Wong-Leong v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Cannizzaro v. MarinyakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Reville v. RevilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Speedway LLC v. Devorah L. Jarrett, as the of the Estate of Kevin M. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.