Legal Opinion

Baum v. Baum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1990No. 627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order holding appellant in civil contempt, and ordering him to pay the sum of $40.74 to appellee. Appellant and appellee are husband and wife. In response to a petition filed by appellee, the trial court entered an order on September 7, 1989 directing, inter alia, that appellant and appellee have no direct or indirect contact with one another, except through counsel. Testimony in the case indicated that on September 22, 1989, appellant went to appellee’s residence, went underneath appellee’s 1989 Chrysler LeBaron, and cut a radiator hose. While the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Fenstamaker v. FenstamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Ryan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Fatemi v. FatemiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Travitzky v. TravitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. GILMORE BY GILMORE v. DonderoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Bowman v. Meadow Ridge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Dansby v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. Koehler, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API