Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 2, 1956No. Civ. No. 7583PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
■ Plaintiff brings this action to enjoin ■defendants from violating the provisions of Sections 215(a) (1) and 215(a) (2) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, Act of June 25, 1988, c. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, as amended by Act of October 26, 1949, 63 Stat. 910, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq.
Parties
Plaintiff is the Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor.
Defendants are the Oregon Frozen Foods Company and Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc. Both are Oregon corporations located in Ontario, Oregon.
Defendant Oregon Frozen Foods is engaged in freezing corn on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Mitchell v. BuddSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Fleming v. Swift & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
- McComb v. Hunt Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mitchell v. Cowley & Bro.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Oregon Frozen Foods Company and Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Oregon Frozen Foods Company and Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Hodgson v. Stokely-Van CampDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Yogurt Master, Inc. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.