Legal Opinion

Gill v. Universal CIT Credit Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 8, 1955No. 6801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation, an automobile finance company, sued Joe Gill d/b/a Ace Auto Sales, an automobile dealer, alleging breach of a written “Retail Protection Agreement”, alleging that under said contract Gill was obligated to purchase from it seven automobiles which it had repossessed from seven defaulting purchasers to whom Gill had sold said automobiles originally and from whom he had taken promissory notes secured by mortgages upon said automobiles, which notes and mortgages had been purchased by the finance company from Gill and duly assigned by Gill to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Rattan v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Associates Inv. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. National Bond & Investment Co. v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Associates Inv. Co. v. SosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Ed Maher, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Mid-States Homes, Inc. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Ramey v. Amarillo Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Bradford v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Bradford v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API