Bradford v. MacK

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellee General Motors Acceptance Corporation has filed its motion for a rehearing relative to the matter of the finance charge, again alleging and maintaining that *940such was not usurious and that the transaction in controversy complied with and came under the protection of Article 5074a, V.A.C.S.

We have reviewed the entire matter and do not find any additional information or sufficient reason in the motion to reverse our original holding.

It is clear from the record that C. E. Mack did not, in the contract which he sold to G.M.A.C., correctly and sufficiently itemize…