Hume v. Schintz
Texas Supreme Court
Application for writ of error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Travis County. For the previous history of this litigation see: Schintz v. Morris, 89 Texas, 648; Hume v. Schintz, 90 Texas, 72; Schintz v. Morris, 13 Texas Civ. App., 580; same case, 35 S. W. Rep., 516; 35 S. W. Rep., 825 (on rehearing); 36 S. W. Rep., 292 (dissenting opinion).
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
This is an application for writ of error to a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed the final judgment of the District Court in the suit of Schintz against Hume and another. From this suit two ancillary proceedings have arisen, which have been before this court. The first was a mandamus granted by the Court of Civil Appeals commanding the judge of the District Court in which the suit was pending to proceed to the trial of one of the causes of action set up in the petition. In that proceeding a writ of error from this court was applied for, but we held we…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lloyd v. BrinckTexas Supreme Court · 1872
- Hume v. SchintzTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Schintz v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. WyrickTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Wright v. Longhorn Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Albert v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Nalle v. WalentaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937