Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wyrick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1952No. A-3407PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

The principal question in this case is whether a trial court has authority to render judgment nunc pro tunc on a special issue verdict after the term of court at which the verdict was returned had expired, no judgment having been rendered during that term.

The respondent, Wyrick, sued the petitioner, Williams, for damages for breach of an oral contract for the sale and purchase of tomato plants and tomato seed. The allegations of his petition would have supported a judgment for $1941.23, but his prayer for recovery was for $1851.23. The jury in answer to a special issue assessed his damages at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Southland-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lloyd v. BrinckTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Dunn v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gordon v. LakeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Byke v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Couch v. City of RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Liberty Sign Company v. NewsomTexas Supreme Court · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API