Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh Meats
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentArnold, Circuit Judge
I respectfully disagree with the court’s conclusion that the courts of the State of Nebraska would not recognize a claim for unjust enrichment in the circumstances of this case. The law of restitution, as the court seems to recognize, is well established in Nebraska. Generally speaking, restitution is available whenever a person acquires a benefit that in justice he or she ought not to retain. Ahrens v. Dye, 208 Neb. 129, 133, 302 N.W.2d 682, 684-85 (1981). The generality of this principle may account for the court’s reluctance here to entertain this suit, but in truth the principle is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Sebastian Rucci v. The City of PacificCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Williams Electronics Games, Inc. v. GarrityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Ahrens v. DyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Collection Bureau of Grand Island, Inc. v. FryNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.