Legal Opinion
Williams Electronics Games, Inc. v. Garrity
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 29, 2004No. 03-1648, 03-1665, 03-1669PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Williams, the manufacturer of Mortal Kombat and other video games, brought suit for fraud and related misconduct, federal and state (Illinois law governs the state law claims), against two of its components suppliers, Arrow and Milgray. (National Union, Williams’s insurer, joined as a plaintiff, but need not be discussed separately.) Williams charges the suppliers with, among other things, having bribed one of its buyers, Greg Barry, to buy from them. Williams also named as a defendant James Garrity, a salesman for Arrow. Milgray counterclaimed. It charged that Williams…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Darrell Taylor, D/B/A Darrell Taylor Topographic Charts v. Joseph B. Meirick, D/B/A Lakes IllustratedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Pavey v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Walter Kevin ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Nathaniel S. Shapo v. Clyde Wm. Engle v. Foley & Lardner, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Apex Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Straits Fin. LLC v. Ten Sleep Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.