Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Self v. Self

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1943No. Appeal, 38PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The correct title to this case should be Commonwealth ex rel. Ruth Boldstridge v. William Self and Zoe Self. It was Ruth Boldstridge, not Florence Self, who filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to obtain possession of her five year old daughter, Florence Self, now in the custody of the respondents. After the child, following a hearing, was awarded by the court below to the mother we ordered that the appeal taken to this court should operate as a supersedeas.

The testimony disclosed that Ruth Boldstridge in 1935, when she was nineteen years of age, met William…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Keenan v. Thomas Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cummings v. Nearhoof Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gifford v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. In Re Mark T.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Williams v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Haller v. HannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. George v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API