Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cummings v. Nearhoof Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1940No. Appeal, 145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This is an appeal by the relators from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding, involving the custody of a minor child, then seven years old. The relators, Mr. and Mrs. Cummings, are the parents of the child; the respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Nearhoof, are the persons with whom the child was left, when she was a baby ten weeks old, and the parents, because of the depression, were obliged to break up their home, and the mother became the sole wage-earner, working in New York City. At the time, all the parties lived in Altoona. Relators now have their home in…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Keenan v. Thomas Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Staunton v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ebel v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Self v. SelfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shelton v. Bush Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API