Hoover v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
Gary M. Hoover suffered injuries as the result of a fall suffered in the course of his work for Burlington Northern Railroad Company. Hoover claimed damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1994), alleging that Burlington was negligent in not providing proper training and in not providing a reasonably safe workplace. Hoover appeals from the district court judgment after a jury verdict finding that Burlington was not negligent. Finding no reversible error by the trial court, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Hoover worked for Burlington off and on for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hose v. Chicago Northwestern Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- John J. Borough v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Farmers and Merchants Bank v. GramsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kalkowski v. KalkowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ZeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- State v. KirkseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Cobb v. Sure Crop Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.