Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hurley v. Town of Hollis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 25, 1999No. 96-791Published

1DissentHorton, J.

While the majority correctly states the law governing expansion of nonconforming uses, I believe that the appropriate analysis in this case focuses on the law governing special exceptions. Because I would accordingly reverse the trial court’s order, I respectfully dissent.

“A special exception is a use permitted upon certain conditions as set forth in a town’s zoning ordinance.” New London Land Use Assoc. v. New London Zoning Board, 130 N.H. 510, 517, 543 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1988). To be entitled to a special exception, the applicant must present to the zoning board sufficient evidence to support…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. Peabody v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Barrington East Cluster I Unit Owners' Ass'n v. Town of BarringtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Geiss v. BourassaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Jensen's, Inc. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API