Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Town of Windham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1997No. 96-258PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRODERICK, j.

The plaintiffs, John and Dianna Peabody, appeal a ruling of the Superior Court (Murphy, J.) denying their request for attorney’s fees despite a finding that the Town of Windham Zoning Board of Adjustment (board) acted in bad faith by imposing restrictions on the use of their property. The Town of Windham (town) cross-appeals, arguing that the Superior Court (Goode, J.) erred in vacating the board’s decision. Because we reverse the trial court’s order vacating the board’s decision, the plaintiffs’ appeal is moot.

In February 1993, the plaintiffs purchased property in Windham that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vlahos Realty Co. v. Little Boar's Head DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  2. Arsenault v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  3. Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morgenstern v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Town of Seabrook v. Vachon ManagementSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Lone Pine Hunters' Club, Inc. v. Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Ouellette v. Town of KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API