Hammond v. Morris
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.
The plaintiff brought this action at lav? to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her which she claims were caused by the automobile of the defendant being negligently operated by him. From a verdict for the plaintiff and judgment rendered thereon, defendant appeals.
The defendant moved for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and again at the close of all of the evidence, which motions were overruled.
*601“ ‘A motion for a directed verdict must, for the purpose of a decision thereon, be treated as an admission of the truth of all material and relevant evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrison v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Moncrief v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Riekes v. SchantzNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Parks v. MetzNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Sindelar v. T. B. Hord Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bolio v. ScholtingNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Roby v. AukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Hughes v. ConiglioNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re Estate of KinseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Roberts v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.