Legal Opinion
Oxford v. Housing Authority of City of Barnesville
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 27, 1961No. 38868PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
1. The Housing Authority of the City of Bamesville, Ga., a public housing authority created under the provisions of Code Ann. Ch. 99-11 (Ga. L. 1937, pp. 210-230), brought a suit for refund of sales and use taxes paid by it. The Housing Authority contends that it is not subject to the sales and use tax act by reason of an exemption embodied in Code Ann. § 92-3403a C (2) (d). We are of the opinion that this contention has been ruled” upon adversely to the defendant in error in City of Marietta Hospital Authority v. Redwine, 87 Ga. App. 629 (74 SE2d 670). See also City of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penick v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Carroll v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Neal v. MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Oxford v. J. D. Jewell, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Aldridge v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colorado Department of Revenue v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Farm and Home Savings Ass'n v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Central Credit Union of Maryland v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Celina Mutual Ins. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Southwest Catholic Credit Union v. CharnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.