Worker's Compensation Claim of Howe v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, Justice.
[¶1] Worker’s compensation claimant Dennis Howe appeals from a determination by the Medical Commission (Commission) denying his claim for permanent partial impairment (PPI) benefits. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] We rephrase the issues as:
1. Was there sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Mr. Howe did not suffer any permanent impairment as a result of the chlorine exposure?
2. Was the Commission’s decision arbitrary and capricious?
FACTS
[¶3] Mr. Howe seeks PPI benefits for a work-related injury he suffered in June 2011. He was employed as a maintenance man at the Best…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Rodgers v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim of: Kirk Jacobs v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Torres v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Meima v. BroemmelWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.