Legal Opinion

Worker's Compensation Claim of Howe v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2017No. S-17-0008Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.

[¶1] Worker’s compensation claimant Dennis Howe appeals from a determination by the Medical Commission (Commission) denying his claim for permanent partial impairment (PPI) benefits. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] We rephrase the issues as:

1. Was there sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Mr. Howe did not suffer any permanent impairment as a result of the chlorine exposure?

2. Was the Commission’s decision arbitrary and capricious?

FACTS

[¶3] Mr. Howe seeks PPI benefits for a work-related injury he suffered in June 2011. He was employed as a maintenance man at the Best…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Worker's Compensation Claim of Rodgers v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim of: Kirk Jacobs v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Worker's Compensation Claim of Torres v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Meima v. BroemmelWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API