Worker's Compensation Claim of Torres v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] An injured worker was denied worker’s compensation benefits because he was not “authorized to work by the United States department of justice,” as required by state statute. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-102(a)(vii) (LexisNexis 2001). The district court af*795firmed the Wyoming Workers’ Safety and Compensation Division’s (the Division) denial of benefits and the worker appealed. We dismiss the appeal because the constitutionality of a statute may not be raised in the direct appeal of an administrative agency decision.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] The issues presented by the parties are as follows:
1.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Belco Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
- Billings v. Wyoming Board of Outfitters & GuidesWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Baskin v. State Ex Rel. Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Paravecchio v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Raymond Alexander Verheydt v. Tammi Wai-Ping VerheydtWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- In the Interest Of: RR, KR and RR, Minor Children, FR v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- City of Casper v. HollowayWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Ripley v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.