Legal Opinion

Worker's Compensation Claim of Torres v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2004No. 03-152PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] An injured worker was denied worker’s compensation benefits because he was not “authorized to work by the United States department of justice,” as required by state statute. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-102(a)(vii) (LexisNexis 2001). The district court af*795firmed the Wyoming Workers’ Safety and Compensation Division’s (the Division) denial of benefits and the worker appealed. We dismiss the appeal because the constitutionality of a statute may not be raised in the direct appeal of an administrative agency decision.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] The issues presented by the parties are as follows:

1.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Belco Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johnson v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Billings v. Wyoming Board of Outfitters & GuidesWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Baskin v. State Ex Rel. Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Paravecchio v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Raymond Alexander Verheydt v. Tammi Wai-Ping VerheydtWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In the Interest Of: RR, KR and RR, Minor Children, FR v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. City of Casper v. HollowayWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Ripley v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API