Meima v. Broemmel
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] The appellant, Anthony Meima (Meima), met the appellee, Thomas C. Bro-emmel (Broemmel), in 2001. The two subsequently discussed several business propositions, including Broemmel’s involvement in financing Meima’s purchase of a house in Torrington and Broemmel’s investment in Meima’s real property in California (also known as the Baltic properties). The parties executed numerous documents in that regard; however, their business relationship deteriorated and a lawsuit was filed. Following a bench trial, the district court essentially entered a judgment in favor of Broemmel.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- McElreath v. McElreathTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Lyle Cashion Company v. McKendrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to AGS and AMLD, Minor Children. SASWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Amy C. Roberts v. Steven LockeWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Hoke v. Motel 6 JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Basic Energy Services, L.P. v. Petroleum Resource Management, Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.