Legal Opinion

Meima v. Broemmel

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2005No. 04-159PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] The appellant, Anthony Meima (Meima), met the appellee, Thomas C. Bro-emmel (Broemmel), in 2001. The two subsequently discussed several business propositions, including Broemmel’s involvement in financing Meima’s purchase of a house in Torrington and Broemmel’s investment in Meima’s real property in California (also known as the Baltic properties). The parties executed numerous documents in that regard; however, their business relationship deteriorated and a lawsuit was filed. Following a bench trial, the district court essentially entered a judgment in favor of Broemmel.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. McElreath v. McElreathTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lyle Cashion Company v. McKendrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to AGS and AMLD, Minor Children. SASWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Amy C. Roberts v. Steven LockeWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hoke v. Motel 6 JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Basic Energy Services, L.P. v. Petroleum Resource Management, Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API