Kincade v. MAC CORP.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Amy Kincade (“Amy”) and Rick Kincade (“Rick”) (collectively “the Kincades”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of three defendants, MAC Corporation (MAC), Paul I. Cripe (Cripe), and Muller Welding Company, Inc., d/b/a Muller Rentals (Muller) (collectively “the defendants”), on, the Kincades’ negligence claim. The Kincades raise six issues; however, we find dispositive the following: whether there was a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether any of the defendants proximately caused Amy’s injuries.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hayden v. Paragon SteakhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Miller v. Monsanto Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- U-Haul International, Inc. v. Mike Madrid Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Basicker Ex Rel. Johnson v. Denny's, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by22 opinions
- James Blasius v. Angel Automotive Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pelak v. Indiana Industrial Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wilson v. Lincoln Federal Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hale v. SS Liquors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.