Legal Opinion
Smith v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 1, 2007No. 07-5956PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOD, Chief District Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Defendant”) appeals the decision of the district court, granting Plaintiff-Appellee Royce T. Smith’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Smith”) Motion to Remand the matter to state court. Defendant argues that, under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), it had established the requisite amount in controversy and that remand was not warranted. In response, Plaintiff argues that the district court appropriately determined that Defendant had failed to establish the requisite amount in controversy or, in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Strawn v. AT & T MOBILITY LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Robert Rodriguez v. At&t Mobility Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bell v. Hershey Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Sabrina Roppo v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Farina v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.