Legal Opinion

State v. Clements

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 3, 1989No. 61,563PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Defendant, John F. Clements, appeals his conviction of aggravated criminal sodomy, K.S.A. 21-3506, claiming that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial, K.S.A. 22-3402, and that the trial court erred by permitting the State’s expert witness to explain the psychology and treatability of sexual offenders to the jury. We find that, although the defendant’s statutory right to a speedy trial was not violated, admission of the expert testimony violated the defendant’s right to a fair trial and we reverse.

In 1985, Clements was charged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. State v. HodgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. West v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. TranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API