Legal Opinion

Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1958No. 37155PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. It is not error to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant where the undisputed evidence with all reasonable deductions therefrom demands the conclusion that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. Rupek v. Pig’n Whistle, Inc., 94 Ga. App. 404 (1) (94 S. E. 2d 747); Roberts v. Maxwell, 94 Ga. App. 406 (94 S. E. 2d 764).

2. “The punctual payment of insurance premiums, as and when due, is of the essence of the contract of insurance, and a failure to make such payment in strict compliance with the terms of the contract, in the absence of a waiver expressly made, or arising…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Plumer v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Illinois Life Insurance v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Grant v. Alabama Gold Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Winder National Bank v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Willis v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. BONNET v. StewartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Starcher v. Reserve Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API