Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1961No. 38983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

Whether reinstatement of a lapsed insurance policy is prospective or retrospective is ordinarily determined by the policy terms. It was held in Winder Nat. Bank v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 36 Ga. App. 703 (2) (137 SE 848) that where the intention of the parties is that the reinstatement shall relate back to the date of default the insured is covered during the interim period. In Plumer v. Continental Cas. Co., 12 Ga. App. 594 (77 SE 917), where there was a policy provision that reinstatement, if accepted, should be effective at noon of the day following the receipt of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plumer v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Winder National Bank v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BONNET v. StewartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Zilka v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Brown v. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API