Legal Opinion
Transtechnology Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 12, 1990No. 700-86CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*352OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982) (“CDA”). Transtechnology Corporation, Space Ordnance Systems Division (“plaintiff” or “SOS”) alleges that the technical data package for M206 infrared countermeasure flares which it used in its contract with the United States Army Armament Material Readiness Command was defective. It also alleges constructive changes to the contract. In its complaint SOS seeks a total of $7,710,519 in damages, plus interest in accordance with the CDA. Its damages include alleged delay and inefficiency…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Bill Strong Enterprises, Inc. v. John Shannon, Acting Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hannon Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Western States Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.