Legal Opinion

Washbon v. Hixon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1912No. 17,381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Jackson district court.

1Opinion of the Court

*311The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The appellants sued to recover the sum of $1040, alleged to have been wrongfully paid to appellee by Albert Sarbach, grand treasurer of the Grand Lodge of Masons of Kansas, out of lodge moneys, in settlement of a personal debt which Sarbach was owing to her. The jury found generally for appellee, and this is an appeal from a judgment in her favor for costs.

The facts are stated quite fully in the former opinion (Washbon v. Hixon, 86 Kan. 406, 121 Pac. 518), where the judgment in favor of Mrs. Hixon, appellee, was affirmed. The decision was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gerard v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. EssexSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. People's National Bank v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Washbon v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washbon v. Linscott State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. American Surety Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. C. M. Condon & Co. State Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API