Chenault v. City of Russellville
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The city of Russellville, Ala., undertook to improve certain of its streets under the provisions of section 2174 et seq. of the Code; and to cause the cost and expense of the improvements to be assessed against the abutting property to the extent of the increased value of such property by reason of the special benefits derived from such improvements. To that end ordinances and resolutions were passed and adopted.
After the work of improving the street upon which appellant’s property abutted had been completed, and the city had accepted the same, and the assessment roll had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Jasper Land Co. v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Town of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Hood v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- City of Jasper v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Jones v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Anderson v. City of Vestavia HillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Riley v. SrofeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Smythe v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.