Legal Opinion

Lind v. Lund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

By its answers to questions of a special verdict the jury absolved Mrs. Lind of negligence. It found Thorne guilty of causal negligence with respect to speed, management and control, and yielding the right of way, and that such negligence increased the danger assumed by his guest, Carol Lind, upon entering his automobile. It found' Lund causally negligent with respect to crossing the intersection at too low a rate of speed and that by such negligence he increased the danger assumed by his wife upon entering his car.

The trial court changed from “No” to “Yes” the answers to each of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Forecki v. KohlbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rock v. SarazenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Crane v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Weber v. MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lewis v. LeitermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API