Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, District Judge.
This proceeding involves a motion by the defendants under Rule 12(b) F.R. C.P. to dismiss the plaintiff’s action, on the ground that its petition to vacate and enjoin enforcement of the judgment in another action, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the plaintiff is not a party in interest.
The controversy and the judgment sought to be vacated has its origin and history in a condemnation proceeding entitled: United States of America v. 640.14 Acres of Land, more or less, Situated in Stanley and Dewey Counties, State of South Dakota, and Peter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Williams v. BankheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Marvin Thomason v. Hospital T v. Rentals, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of Indians, Eagle Butte, South Dakota v. United States of America and Peter Hiatt, Eagle Butte, South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1963