Legal Opinion
State v. Parkinson
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2000No. 25854PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.
The state appeals from the district court’s order granting Doris Ann Parkinson’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a search subsequent to a drug dog sniff conducted during a routine traffic stop. The state argues that the district court erred in concluding that police questioning about drugs and weapons and the dog sniff were not reasonably related to the traffic stop, thus exceeding its scope. We reverse.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 25, 1999, at about 2:45 p.m., Ponderay City Police Officer David McClelland observed a red Dodge truck with an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. SheldonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GutierrezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. RoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.