Legal Opinion

Burton v. Youngblood

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. 18929PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff Verna Lee Burton appeals from an order under Rule 41(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing her claim against Robert L. Youngblood, M.D. at the close of her case. She had alleged that Youngblood was negligent in treating her and that he had not obtained her informed consent for the surgery at issue. On appeal, Burton seeks reversal on two grounds. First, she asserts that the trial court improperly excluded testimony by her expert witness concerning the appropriate standard of care and that if the evidence had been admitted, a Rule 41(b) motion would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Wessel v. Erickson Landscaping Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Caro v. BumpusColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dalley v. Utah Valley Regional Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wessel v. Erickson Landscaping Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Chadwick v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Patey v. LainhartUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Arnold v. CurtisUtah Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API