Patey v. Lainhart
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
¶ 1 Defendant Kurt Lainhart appeals from a jury verdict awarding plaintiff Michelle Patey damages for injuries she received in an automobile accident Lainhart caused. Lainhart argues that the trial court impermissibly allowed Patey’s dentist, Dr. Leland Bitner, to testify that the car accident was caused injuries to her teeth and to relate the opinions of other dentists to whom he had referred Patey. Lainhart also asserts that Bitner was not qualified to give an opinion about the causation of Patey’s injuries and that the basis for his opinion lacked inherent reliability…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of JAMES WILSON ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Appeals of METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Lewis v. Rego Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Darryl FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. KelleyUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Green v. LouderUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. Grand Canyon Expeditions Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.