State v. Malpher
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] Margo Malpher appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Calais, Romei, J.) forfeiting Malpher’s twenty dogs and one cat to the State of Maine Animal Welfare Program. Maipher argues that: (1) notice by service and filing of an ex parte order and application for the order, to initiate forfeiture proceedings, is improper procedure pursuant to 17 M.R.S. § 1021 (2007), and is insufficient to constitute due process; and (2) 17 M.R.S. § 1021 is void for vagueness. 1 We affirm the District Court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] In September 2006, Chrissy Perry, a humane agent for the State of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. WithamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Yeadon Fabric Domes, Inc. v. Maine Sports Complex, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Guardianship of K-MSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Maine v. Julia PeckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Rich v. DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCESSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. McKeenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- NICKERSON-MALPHER v. WorleyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Nickerson-Malpher v. BaldacciDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.