Legal Opinion

State v. Malpher

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 28, 2008No. Docket: Was-07-63PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Margo Malpher appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Calais, Romei, J.) forfeiting Malpher’s twenty dogs and one cat to the State of Maine Animal Welfare Program. Maipher argues that: (1) notice by service and filing of an ex parte order and application for the order, to initiate forfeiture proceedings, is improper procedure pursuant to 17 M.R.S. § 1021 (2007), and is insufficient to constitute due process; and (2) 17 M.R.S. § 1021 is void for vagueness. 1 We affirm the District Court’s judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] In September 2006, Chrissy Perry, a humane agent for the State of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WithamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Yeadon Fabric Domes, Inc. v. Maine Sports Complex, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. Guardianship of K-MSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Julia PeckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Rich v. DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCESSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. State v. McKeenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. NICKERSON-MALPHER v. WorleyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
  5. Nickerson-Malpher v. BaldacciDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API