Ault v. Shipley
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
The appellants, who were the complainants in the trial court, filed their bill praying for an injunction to restrain the defendants, appellees here, from violating a certain building restriction. The court was of the opinion that the conditions had so changed in this particular locality that it would have been inequitable to have perpetuated the temporary injunction which had been granted, and the bill was dismissed.
The appellants each own one or more lots in a real estate development in Bristol, known as Virginia Heights, and the defendant, Margaret V. Shipley, owns all of block 5, which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Ludgate v. SomervilleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Stevenson v. SpiveySupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Deitrick v. LeadbetterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Cheatham v. TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- SCHULMAN v. SerrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Chuba v. GlasgowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Duffy v. MolloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Omega Corp. of Chesterfield v. MalloySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.