Legal Opinion

Omega Corp. of Chesterfield v. Malloy

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 7, 1984No. Record 812080PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, C.J.

This appeal involves a proposal to construct and operate group homes for the mentally retarded in subdivisions subject to restrictive covenants which limit uses to “residential purposes” and prohibit buildings other than “single-family” dwellings. The subdivisions in question are Providence Pines and Scottingham, both located in Chesterfield County.

The Omega Corporation of Chesterfield, a nonstock, nonprofit Virginia corporation (Omega), owns one lot in each subdivision. Omega proposed to build a dwelling on each lot “to provide mentally retarded adults with normal residential housing in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Crowley v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Friedberg v. Riverpoint Building CommitteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Hessling v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Bellarmine Hills Ass'n v. Residential Systems Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Blevins v. Barry-Lawrence County Ass'n for Retarded CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Jackson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hagemann v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API