Legal Opinion

United States v. Vanis Ray Robbins

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1975No. 74--1363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellee was indicted for extortion in attempting to collect a gambling debt. A jury was empaneled, and after the government had rested, the appellee made a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. The district judge, after reviewing the government’s evidence, held that the statute involved (18 U.S.C. § 894) does not apply to the collection of illegal gambling debts. Accordingly, he entered a judgment of acquittal.

The government perfected this appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, maintaining that notwithstanding the fact that the judgment below was based upon facts established by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Edmund Herman RothfelderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. John Arthur ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Jack Anthony LucidoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. State v. KleinwaksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. State v. KleinwaksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API