Legal Opinion

United States v. John Arthur Scott

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1976No. 76-1533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellee was charged in a three count indictment with the distribution of cocaine, codeine and heroin. The counts related to separate occurrences, and because a substantial period had elapsed between the commission of the offenses charged in counts 1 and 2, a motion for their dismissal on the ground of preindictment delay was filed prior to trial, which was denied without prejudice. At the jury trial the motion was renewed at the conclusion of the government’s case, and it was again denied without prejudice. Subsequently, after the defense had presented its case and had rested, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Vanis Ray RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Jack Anthony LucidoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Vaughn Parrish Hawk v. Harry Berkemer, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. Gerard Joseph Palazzolo v. David G. Gorcyca, Oakland County ProsecutorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. John Arthur ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Kruelski v. Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API