Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kleinwaks

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 29, 1975Published

1Dissent

Contokd, P. J. A. D.,

Temporarily Assigned (dissenting). We are called upon here to decide for the first time the constitutionality under the New Jersey Double Jeopardy Clause, Const. (1947), Art. I, Par. 11, of R. 2:3-1 (b)(3), which allows the State to appeal from the grant by a trial judge of a judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to R. 3:18-2.1 In the earlier phases of the appeal defendant argued only violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Eifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, but, by invitation of the Court, the argument and inquiry have been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API