Legal Opinion

Veith v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 13, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Eeversing.

William Patterson and Ms employer, Jolin A. Yeith, had accepted .and were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. As the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, Patterson, on November 4, 1927, received injuries which resulted in his death on December 18, 1927. On the divorce of Patterson from Ms wife, he was awarded the custody of their child, Jennie May Patterson. On May 23, 1927, Jennie May Patterson was committed to the Kentucky State Eeform School, an institution maintained by the state,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WhaleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fordson Coal Company v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Ramey v. Portsmouth By-Product Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Vigo Am. Clay Co. v. Kelley, Gdn.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franklin Fluorspar Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Holland Construction Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Johnson v. Kentucky Color & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Harris County Texas v. Carmax AutoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API