Legal Opinion
Condor Corp. v. Cunningham
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1945No. Civ. 14634PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover from defendants the sum of $29,350.87, allegedly due as the proceeds of certain checks, payable to plaintiff, and collected by defendant bank from the drawee bank upon the alleged unauthorized endorsement by defendant Cunningham, and to which endorsee the proceeds of said checks were paid.
We do not deem it necessary to a determination of the questions presented upon this appeal to set forth in minute detail the factual background upon which this litigation rests, and shall therefore epitomize from the record what we consider to be the salient facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Walsh v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Santa Marina Co. v. Canadian Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- National Bank of San Mateo v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oswald MacHine & Equipment, Inc. v. YipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Western Industries, Inc. v. General Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Associates Discount Corp. v. Tobb Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Boston Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Counties Mechanical Construction Co. v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1963