Legal Opinion
Klvana v. State of Cal.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 15, 1995No. CV 94-0863-RMT (RMC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
TAKASUGI, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) a Judgment shall be entered denying the petition for writ of habeas…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hargrave-Thomas v. YukinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002