Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for the writ of habeas corpus [docket entry 1]. This Court has entertained the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, and has held an evidentiary hearing. For the reasons set forth below, this Court shall grant the writ, vacate Petitioner’s conviction and sentence, and order that the State of Michigan either grant Petitioner a new trial within ninety days of entry of this order or release Petitioner unconditionally.
I FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On November 5, 1993, the Honorable Wendy Baxter of the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hargrave-Thomas v. YukinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- HARGRAVE-THOMAS v. YukinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006