State of Minnesota v. Keith Richard Rossberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
This is appellant Keith Rossberg’s direct appeal from his conviction for first-degree premeditated murder, see Minn.Stat. § 609.185(a)(1) (2012), for killing Devan Hawkinson. Rossberg claims that he is entitled to a new trial because the district court admitted evidence of his past conduct and relationship with . Hawkinson. Rossberg argues that the evidence was irrelevant and that it violated the Confrontation Clause because it included testimonial statements that Hawkinson made to the police before his death. Rossberg also raises a variety of other claims in his pro…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. TscheuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Heather Leann HorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Marlon Rashaad RobertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.